ArticleStudies in family planning2020
Using Systematic Anomalous Case Analysis to Examine Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes in the Philippines.
Article in Studies in family planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- An application of Systematic Anomalous Case Analysis to improve models predicting contraceptive use in the Philippines.Journal of biosocial science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Philippines is characterized by sustained economic growth and political stability, yet sexual and reproductive health indicators have stalled or even worsened in recent decades. We employed an innovative, mixed-methods approach-Systematic Anomalous Case Analysis-to gain insights into these worsening trends by examining sexual and reproductive decision-making among a cohort of young adults in Metro Cebu, Philippines. We first analyzed longitudinal data (1998-2009) to predict reproductive outcomes (i.e., age of first sex, number of living children) among participants in the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey to identify cases (predicted and anomalous) with whom we subsequently conducted qualitative, in-depth interviews in 2013-14 (n = 48). Analysis of the qualitative data revealed unique social and contextual factors that shaped patterns of sexual and contraceptive decision-making across three, distinct reproductive life stages: (1) at first sex, (2) after the birth of first child, and (3) after the birth of several children. However, gendered roles and expectations exerted strong influences on sexual and reproductive outcomes across these life stages. Finally, we identified two constructs from our qualitative analysis-sexual fluidity and sexual agency-that deserve further examination and integration into theoretical and empirical models of sexual and reproductive decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.