Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32459783›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2020

The Economic Burden of Out-of-Pocket Expenses for Plastic Surgery Procedures.

Jessica I Billig, Jung-Sheng Chen, Yu-Ting Lu, Kevin C Chung, Erika D Sears

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Out-Of-Pocket Expenses of Carpal Tunnel Release.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Out-of-Pocket Costs and Surprise Billing in Otolaryngology: A National Database Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica I BilligFrom the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; the Section of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine; and the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Jung-Sheng ChenFrom the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; the Section of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine; and the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Yu-Ting LuFrom the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; the Section of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine; and the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Kevin C ChungFrom the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; the Section of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine; and the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Erika D SearsFrom the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; the Section of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine; and the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Funding

Assessing Treatment Delay and Resource Use to Improve Value of Pre-Surgical CareIK2HX002592 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI SEARS, ERIKA D · 2018 to 2022
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth insurance reimbursement structure has evolved, with patients becoming increasingly responsible for their health care costs through rising out-of-pocket expenses. High levels of cost sharing can lead to delays in access to care, influence treatment decisions, and cause financial distress for patients.

methodsPatients undergoing the most common outpatient reconstructive plastic surgery operations were identified using Truven MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2017. Total cost of the surgery paid to the insurer and out-of-pocket expenses, including deductible, copayment, and coinsurance, were calculated. Multivariable generalized linear modeling with log link and gamma distribution was used to predict adjusted total and out-of-pocket expenses. All costs were inflation-adjusted to 2017 dollars.

resultsThe authors evaluated 3,165,913 outpatient plastic and reconstructive surgical procedures between 2009 and 2017. From 2009 to 2017, total costs had a significant increase of 25 percent, and out-of-pocket expenses had a significant increase of 54 percent. Using generalized linear modeling, procedures performed in outpatient hospitals conferred an additional $1999 in total costs (95 percent CI, $1978 to $2020) and $259 in out-of-pocket expenses (95 percent CI, $254 to $264) compared with office procedures. Ambulatory surgical center procedures conferred an additional $1698 in total costs (95 percent CI, $1677 to $1718) and $279 in out-of-pocket expenses (95 percent CI, $273 to $285) compared with office procedures.

conclusionsFor outpatient plastic surgery procedures, out-of-pocket expenses are increasing at a faster rate than total costs, which may have implications for access to care and timing of surgery. Providers should realize the increasing burden of out-of-pocket expenses and the effect of surgical location on patients' costs when possible.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresCost SavingsCost SharingDatabases, FactualFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth ExpendituresHospital ChargesHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMaleManaged Care ProgramsMedicare

Identifiers

PMID32459783
PMCPMC8028743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.