ArticleJournal of glaucoma2020
Improving the Detection of Glaucoma and Its Progression: A Topographical Approach.
Article in Journal of glaucoma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pattern-Based OCT Metric for Glaucoma Detection.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Predicting perimetric defects from en face maps of retinal nerve fibre layer reflectance.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and glaucoma: a lucid and comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Progression of Early Glaucomatous Damage: Performance of Summary Statistics From Optical Coherence Tomography and Perimetry.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Test of a Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundle Trajectory Model Using Eyes With Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Did the OCT Show Progression Since the Last Visit?Journal of glaucoma · 2021Article
- Focal Structure-Function Relationships in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using OCT and OCT-A Measurements.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- The 24-2 Visual Field Guided Progression Analysis Can Miss the Progression of Glaucomatous Damage of the Macula Seen Using OCT.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Glaucoma is typically defined as a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by a specific (arcuate) pattern of visual field (VF) and anatomic changes. Therefore, we should be comparing arcuate patterns of damage seen on VFs with those seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT) maps. Instead, clinicians often use summary metrics such as VF pattern standard deviation, OCT retinal nerve fiber (RNF) global thickness, etc. There are 2 major impediments to topographically comparing patterns of damage on VF and OCT maps. First, until recently, it was not easy to make these comparisons with commercial reports. While recent reports do make it easier to compare VF and OCT maps, they have shortcomings. In particular, the 24-2 VF covers a larger retinal region than the commercial OCT scans, and, further, it is not easy to understand the topographical relationship among the different maps/plots within the current OCT reports. Here we show how a model of RNF bundles can overcome these problems. The second major impediment is the lack of a quantitative, and automated, method for comparing patterns of damage seen on VF and OCT maps. However, it is now possible to objectively and automatically quantify this agreement. Together, the RNF bundle model and the automated structure-function method should improve the power of topographical methods for detecting glaucoma and its progression. This should prove useful in clinical studies and trials, as well as for training and validating artificial intelligence/deep learning approaches for these purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.