Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32459648›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Measurement of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior by Accelerometry Among a Nationwide Sample from the KiGGS and MoMo Study: Study Protocol.

Alexander Burchartz, Kristin Manz, Bastian Anedda, Claudia Niessner, Doris Oriwol, Steffen Ce Schmidt, Alexander Woll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander BurchartzInstitute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1338-5395
Kristin ManzRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-516X
Bastian AneddaInstitute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6102-4629
Claudia NiessnerInstitute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2094-0836
Doris OriwolInstitute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-3539
Steffen Ce SchmidtInstitute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-5676
Alexander WollInstitute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-2980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, no nationwide objective physical activity data exists for children and adolescents living in Germany. The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) and the Motorik-Modul study (MoMo) is a national cohort study that has incorporated accelerometers in its most recent data collection wave (wave 2, since 2014). This wave 2 marks the first nationwide collection of objective data on the physical activity of children and adolescents living in Germany.

objectiveThe purpose of this protocol is to describe the methods used in the KiGGS and MoMo study to capture the intensity, frequency, and duration of physical activity with accelerometers.

methodsParticipants (N=11,003, aged 6 to 31 years) were instructed to wear an ActiGraph GT3X+ or wGT3X-BT accelerometer laterally on the right hip. Accelerometers were worn on consecutive days during waking hours, including at least 4 valid weekdays and 1 weekend day (wear time >8 hours) in the evaluation. A nonwear time protocol was also implemented.

resultsData collection was completed by October 2017. Data harmonization took place in 2018. The first accelerometer results from this wave were published in 2019, and detailed analyses are ready to be submitted in 2020.

conclusionsThis study protocol provides an overview of technical details and basic choices when using accelerometers in large-scale epidemiological studies. At the same time, the restrictions imposed by the specified filters and the evaluation routines must be taken into account. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14370.

Indexed as

epoch lengthintensity classificationMotorik-Modul studyprocessing criteriasampling frequencywear time protocol

Identifiers

PMID32459648
PMCPMC7388053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.