Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020
Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab Versus Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a pathways pilot with systematic review, evidence synthesis and economic model.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 RCT based meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of older people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Immune-related cardiovascular toxicities of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Pancreatic adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for solid cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Association of Anticancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessed in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- The Risk of Immune-Related Thyroid Dysfunction Induced by PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Assessment of the Clinical Trials Safety Profile of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Among Patients With Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Clinical and Biomarker Data From the Randomized Phase II IMbrave151 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy with or Without Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- When Survival Improves But Quality of Life Does Not: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with High PD-L1 expression in Japan.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Successful Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge After Sintilimab-Induced Pancreatitis: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes With First-Line Immunotherapy-Based Combination Treatment for Advanced Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.Thoracic cancer · 2025Observational
- Interleukin-11 promotes lung adenocarcinoma tumourigenesis and immune evasion.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients with Immune-Related Endocrinopathies During Immunotherapy: A Prospective Study Based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 Questionnaires in Romania.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Engineering of extracellular vesicles for efficient intracellular delivery of multimodal therapeutics including genome editors.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAtezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) demonstrated survival benefit versus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) in chemotherapy-naïve nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to provide additional information on the relative impact of adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in nonsquamous NSCLC.
methodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ACP), ABCP, or BCP. Coprimary end points were overall survival and investigator-assessed progression-free survival. The incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. PROs, a secondary end point, were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-Core 30 and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer 13.
resultsOverall, 400 (ACP), 393 (ABCP), and 394 (BCP) patients were safety evaluable (ie, intention-to-treat population that received one or more doses of any study treatment). More patients had grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs during the induction versus maintenance phase (ACP, 40.5%
conclusionABCP seems tolerable and manageable versus ACP and BCP in first-line nonsquamous NSCLC. Treatment tolerability differed between induction and maintenance phases across treatment arms. PROs reflect a minimal treatment burden (eg, health-related quality of life, symptoms) with each regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.