Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32459172›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Transgenesis and web resources in quail.

Olivier Serralbo, David Salgado, Nadège Véron, Caitlin Cooper, Marie-Julie Dejardin, Timothy Doran, Jérome Gros, Christophe Marcelle

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Manipulating primordial germ cells from chicken and other bird species.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The cellular dynamics of neural tube formation.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Avian Embryonic Culture: A Perspective ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivier SerralboAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-3464
David SalgadoMarseille Medical Genetics (GMGF), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Nadège VéronAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Caitlin CooperCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.
Marie-Julie DejardinInstitut NeuroMyoGène (INMG), University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Timothy DoranCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.
Jérome GrosDepartment of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France.
Christophe MarcelleAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9612-7609
Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

AFM-Téléthon Research grantAssociation Française contre les Myopathies Research grantStem Cells Australia Research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its amenability to manipulations, to live observation and its striking similarities to mammals, the chicken embryo has been one of the major animal models in biomedical research. Although it is technically possible to genome-edit the chicken, its long generation time (6 months to sexual maturity) makes it an impractical lab model and has prevented it widespread use in research. The Japanese quail (

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCoturnixFemaleMalePlasmidsTransfectionWeb Browsergeneticsgenomicsprimordial germ cellsquailtransfectiontransgenesis

Identifiers

PMID32459172
PMCPMC7286689
OpenAlexW3032288647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.