Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458986›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2020

Inhibition of SETMAR-H3K36me2-NHEJ repair axis in residual disease cells prevents glioblastoma recurrence.

Ekjot Kaur, Jyothi Nair, Atanu Ghorai, Saket V Mishra, Anagha Achareker, Madhura Ketkar, Debashmita Sarkar, Sameer Salunkhe, Jacinth Rajendra, Nilesh Gardi and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. DNA repair in tumor radioresistance: insights from fruit flies genetics.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ekjot KaurShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Jyothi NairShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Atanu GhoraiShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Saket V MishraShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Anagha AcharekerShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Madhura KetkarShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Debashmita SarkarShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sameer SalunkheShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Jacinth RajendraShilpee Dutt Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Nilesh GardiIntegrated Genomics Laboratory, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sanket DesaiIntegrated Genomics Laboratory, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Prajish IyerIntegrated Genomics Laboratory, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Rahul ThoratLaboratory Animal Facility, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Amit DuttIntegrated Genomics Laboratory, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Aliasgar MoiyadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Shilpee DuttIntegrated Genomics Laboratory, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidual disease of glioblastoma (GBM) causes recurrence. However, targeting residual cells has failed, due to their inaccessibility and our lack of understanding of their survival mechanisms to radiation therapy. Here we deciphered a residual cell-specific survival mechanism essential for GBM relapse.

methodsTherapy resistant residual (RR) cells were captured from primary patient samples and cell line models mimicking clinical scenario of radiation resistance. Molecular signaling of resistance in RR cells was identified using RNA sequencing, genetic and pharmacological perturbations, overexpression systems, and molecular and biochemical assays. Findings were validated in patient samples and an orthotopic mouse model.

resultsRR cells form more aggressive tumors than the parental cells in an orthotopic mouse model. Upon radiation-induced damage, RR cells preferentially activated a nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, upregulating Ku80 and Artemis while downregulating meiotic recombination 11 (Mre11) at protein but not RNA levels. Mechanistically, RR cells upregulate the Su(var)3-9/enhancer-of-zeste/trithorax (SET) domain and mariner transposase fusion gene (SETMAR), mediating high levels of H3K36me2 and global euchromatization. High H3K36me2 leads to efficiently recruiting NHEJ proteins. Conditional knockdown of SETMAR in RR cells induced irreversible senescence partly mediated by reduced H3K36me2. RR cells expressing mutant H3K36A could not retain Ku80 at double-strand breaks, thus compromising NHEJ repair, leading to apoptosis and abrogation of tumorigenicity in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacological inhibition of the NHEJ pathway phenocopied H3K36 mutation effect, confirming dependency of RR cells on the NHEJ pathway for their survival.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that the SETMAR-NHEJ regulatory axis is essential for the survival of clinically relevant radiation RR cells, abrogation of which prevents recurrence in GBM.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaAnimalsDNA RepairHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansMiceMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseSETMAR protein, humanglioblastomaNHEJradiation resistanceresidual diseaseSETMAR

Identifiers

PMID32458986
PMCPMC7746947
OpenAlexW3030211062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.