Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458783›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Yellow Fever Vaccine Safety Perception of Pregnant Women in Emergency Response Mass Vaccination in Uganda.

Lena Huebl, Aloysious Nnyombi, Eddy Walakira, Ruth Kutalek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Perspective of Quilombola Communities in Brazil on a Yellow Fever Outbreak and Vaccination.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lena Huebl1Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Unit Medical Anthropology and Global Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aloysious Nnyombi2Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Eddy Walakira2Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ruth Kutalek1Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Unit Medical Anthropology and Global Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Makerere University · UGMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yellow fever vaccine, a live attenuated vaccine, is primarily administered to pregnant women during outbreaks. A qualitative study was conducted in pregnant women on the perception of yellow fever mass vaccination. In total, interviews with 20 women-13 semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion with seven participants-were analyzed. This study showed that conflicting information about vaccine safety led to concern about miscarriage. Furthermore, it was believed that vaccination during gestation would concurrently immunize the fetus by transplacental antibody transfer. Consultation of health workers at the vaccination site led to diverse recommendations. When vaccinating pregnant women, clear health communication is crucial. Vaccine recommendations should be obeyed, and health workers should be trained to address emerging vaccine concerns. Pregnant women should be informed that a booster dose is recommended to achieve lifelong immunity. After pregnancy, a booster should be offered to women in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial PerceptionAbortion, SpontaneousAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansImmunization, SecondaryMass VaccinationPatient SafetyPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaVaccines, AttenuatedYellow FeverVaccines, AttenuatedYellow Fever Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID32458783
PMCPMC7356404
OpenAlexW3031849846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.