Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458780›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Risk Factors for Epidemic Cholera in Lusaka, Zambia-2017.

Francis H Nanzaluka, William W Davis, Lwito Mutale, Fred Kapaya, Patrick Sakubita, Nelia Langa, Angela Gama, Hammad S N'cho, Warren Malambo, Jennifer Murphy and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Francis H Nanzaluka1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
William W Davis4U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lwito Mutale1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Fred Kapaya1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Patrick Sakubita1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nelia Langa1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Angela Gama1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Hammad S N'cho4U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Warren Malambo3Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jennifer Murphy4U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anna Blackstock4U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eric Mintz4U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Margaret Riggs5U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.
Victor Mukonka1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nyambe Sinyange1Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ellen Yard3Zambia Field Epidemiology Training Program, Lusaka, Zambia.
Joan Brunkard4U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia · ZMCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USZambia National Public Health Institute · ZMCopperbelt University · ZMMinistry of Health · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On October 6, 2017, the Zambia Ministry of Health declared a cholera outbreak in Lusaka. By December, 1,462 cases and 38 deaths had occurred (case fatality rate, 2.6%). We conducted a case-control study to identify risk factors and inform interventions. A case was any person with acute watery diarrhea (≥ 3 loose stools in 24 hours) admitted to a cholera treatment center in Lusaka from December 16 to 21, 2017. Controls were neighbors without diarrhea during the same time period. Up to two controls were matched to each case by age-group (1-4, 5-17, and ≥ 18 years) and neighborhood. Surveyors interviewed cases and controls, tested free chlorine residual (FCR) in stored water, and observed the presence of soap in the home. Conditional logistic regression was used to generate matched odds ratios (mORs) based on subdistricts and age-groups with 95% CIs. We enrolled 82 cases and 132 controls. Stored water in 71% of case homes had an FCR > 0.2 mg/L. In multivariable analyses, those who drank borehole water (mOR = 2.4, CI: 1.1-5.6), had close contact with a cholera case (mOR = 6.2, CI: 2.5-15), and were male (mOR = 2.5, CI: 1.4-5.0) had higher odds of being a cholera case than their matched controls. Based on these findings, we recommended health education about household water chlorination and hygiene in the home. Emergency responses included providing chlorinated water through emergency tanks and maintaining adequate FCR levels through close monitoring of water sources.

Indexed as

SoapsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolChlorineCholeraDrinking WaterEpidemicsFemaleHealth EducationHumansHygieneChlorineDrinking WaterSoaps

Identifiers

PMID32458780
PMCPMC7410454
OpenAlexW3029850288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.