Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458597›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2020

Gynecologic oncology at the time of COVID-19 outbreak.

Giorgio Bogani, Claudia Brusadelli, Rocco Guerrisi, Salvatore Lopez, Mauro Signorelli, Antonino Ditto, Francesco Raspagliesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 - a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giorgio BoganiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy. giorgiobogani@yahoo.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8569
Claudia BrusadelliUniverity of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-4708
Rocco GuerrisiUniverity of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2380-324X
Salvatore LopezFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-3715
Mauro SignorelliFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-5233
Antonino DittoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-8225
Francesco RaspagliesiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8953-1657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) classified the novel coronavirus (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) as a global public health emergency. COVID-19 threatens to curtail patient access to evidence-based treatment. Medicine is changing, basically due to the limited available resources. In the field of gynecologic oncology, we have to re-design our treatments' paradigm. During COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, the highest priority is to achieve the maximum benefit from less demanding procedures. Extensive procedures should be avoided, in order to reduce hospitalization and postoperative events that might increase the in-hospital spread of the virus. There are ongoing concerns on the use of laparoscopic procedures, related to the possible contamination of the staff working in the operation room. Other minimally invasive techniques, including, vaginal surgery as well as robotic-assisted and isobaric procedures would be preferred over laparoscopy. A fair allocation of resources is paramount adequate treatments.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGuidelines as TopicGynecologyHumansOncologistsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Gynecologic OncologySARS-CoV-2Surgery

Identifiers

PMID32458597
PMCPMC7286755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.