Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458375›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020

Is cellular energy monitoring more responsive to hypoxia than pulse oximetry?

Guy M Hatch, Liza Ashbrook, Aric A Prather, Andrew D Krystal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guy M HatchReveal Biosensors, Inc, Logan, UT, USA.
Liza AshbrookUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aric A PratherUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew D KrystalUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. andrew.krystal@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-781X
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Reveal Biosensors Inc. Reveal Biosensors, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePulse oximetry is the current standard for detecting drops in arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO

methodsWe assessed both CE monitoring and pulse oximetry in a series of conditions which affect oxygen supply: (1) breathing nitrogen or 100% oxygen, (2) physical exertion, and (3) studying a night of sleep in an individual known to be a loud snorer. We also present the results of a preliminary study comparing CE monitoring to pulse oximetry in eight individuals undergoing standard clinical overnight polysomnography for suspected SDB.

resultsCE monitoring is responsive to changes in cellular oxygen supply to the skin and detects hypoxia during SDB events that is not detected by pulse oximetry.

conclusionCE monitoring is a promising tool for identifying pathology at the mild end of the SDB spectrum.

Indexed as

OximetryAdultAgedEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansHypoxiaMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPilot ProjectsSleep Apnea SyndromesWearable Electronic DevicesCellular energy monitorCellular hyperoxiaCellular hypoxiaPrimary snoringSleep disordered breathing

Identifiers

PMID32458375
PMCPMC7679291
OpenAlexW3029106050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.