ReviewDer Internist2020
[Vitamin D in geriatric patients].
Review in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role and therapeutic potential of vitamins in fracture healing.Nutrition journal · 2026Review
- Nutritional Status and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: Clinical Perspectives from Mechanisms to Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Vitamin D Deficiency in Institutionalized Older Adults: Associations with Supplementation Practices but Not with Cognitive Decline or Dementia.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Article
- Vitamin D and Sarcopenia: Implications for Muscle Health.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Short-term effect of sunshine duration on daily emergency visits for hip fractures in Beijing, China: a time-series study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- The association of combined vitamin C and D deficiency with bone mineral density and vertebral fracture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- [Secondary fracture prevention/Update osteoporosis guidelines 2023 of the Umbrella Organization Osteology].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- [Lifestyle medication vitamin D. What evidence is available?]Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2023Review
- [Profiling of patients in a specialized geriatric outpatient clinic].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2023Article
- A Comparative Study of Skin Changes in Different Species of Mice in Chronic Photoaging Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Sarcopenia-a geriatric pandemic : A narrative review.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency is widespread in geriatric patients. While vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in about 50% of healthy older adults, the prevalence in geriatric patients with hip fracture increases to over 80%. This is partly due to the fact that sunlight is unreliable as the main source of vitamin D. In addition to insufficient sun intensity from November to April, skin aging plays an important role; it causes a 4-fold reduction in the skin's own vitamin D production during sunshine exposure in older adults compared with younger people. Immobility and institutionalization are additional risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in geriatric patients. At the same time, vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/ml) increases parathyroid hormone levels and thus promotes bone loss and the risk of fracture. Severe vitamin D deficiency (< 10 ng/ml) may also lead to reversible muscle weakness resulting in an increased risk of falling. Since falls affect at least every second geriatric patient and hip fractures increase exponentially after the age of 75, the correction of vitamin D deficiency is an important medical and public health effort in these patients. Several randomized intervention trials, comparing 800-1000 IU vitamin D/day versus placebo or calcium, showed a significant reduction in falls and hip fractures in adults ≥65 years of age who had an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency and of falls or fractures. In geriatric patients, implementing vitamin D supplementation at this dosage is currently preferred. A bolus dose of over 24,000 IU/month should be avoided due to the increased risk of falls and fractures. These recommendations remain relevant after a critical review of the four most recent meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.