Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458277›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Optimal intracranial pressure in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with coiling and requiring external ventricular drainage.

Federico Cagnazzo, Kevin Chalard, Pierre-Henri Lefevre, Ocean Garnier, Imad Derraz, Cyril Dargazanli, Gregory Gascou, Carlos Riquelme, Alain Bonafe, Paolo Perrini and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico CagnazzoNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France. f.cagnazzo86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-1678
Kevin ChalardDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Pierre-Henri LefevreNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Ocean GarnierDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Imad DerrazNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Cyril DargazanliNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Gregory GascouNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Carlos RiquelmeNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Alain BonafeNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Paolo PerriniDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Davide Tiziano Di CarloDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Riccardo MorgantiStatistic Analysis Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Marine Le CorreService de neurochirurgie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Frederique PavillardDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Pierre-Francois PerrigaultDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France.
Vincent CostalatNeuroradiology department, University Hospital Güi-de-Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal management of intracranial pressure (ICP) among aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients requiring external ventricular drainage (EVD) is controversial. To analyze predictors of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI)-related cerebral infarction after aSAH and the influence of ICP values on DCI, we prospectively collected consecutive patients with aSAH receiving coiling and requiring EVD. Predictors of DCI-related cerebral infarction (new CT hypodensities developed within the first 3 weeks not related to other causes) were studied. Vasospasm and brain hypoperfusion were studied with CT angiography and CT perfusion (RAPID-software). Among 50 aSAH patients requiring EVD, 21 (42%) developed DCI-related cerebral infarction, while 27 (54%) presented vasospasm. Mean ICP ranged between 2 and 19 mmHg. On the multivariate analysis, the mean ICP (OR = 2, 95%CI = 1.01-3.9, p = 0.042) and the mean hypoperfusion volume on Tmax delay > 6 (OR = 1.2, 95%CI = 1.01-1.3, p = 0.025) were independent predictors of DCI. To predict DCI-related cerebral infarction, Tmax delay > 6 s presented the highest AUC (0.956, SE = 0.025), with a cutoff value of 18 ml showing sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 90.5% (95%CI = 69-98.8%), 86.2% (95%CI = 68.4-96%), 82.6% (95%CI = 65.4-92%), 92.5% (95%CI = 77-98%), and 88% (95%CI = 75-95%), respectively. The AUC of the mean ICP was 0.825 (SE = 0.057), and the best cutoff value was 6.7 mmHg providing sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 71.4% (95%CI = 48-89%), 62% (95%CI = 42-79%), 58% (95%CI = 44-70%), 75% (95%CI = 59-86%), and 66% (95%CI = 51-79%) for the prediction of DCI-related cerebral infarction, respectively. Among aSAH patients receiving coiling and EVD, lower ICP (< 6.7 mmHg in our study) could potentially be beneficial in decreasing DCI-related cerebral infarction. Brain hypoperfusion with a volume > 18 ml at Tmax delay > 6 s presents a high sensibility and specificity in prediction of DCI-related cerebral infarction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDrainageEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSubarachnoid HemorrhageTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCerebral infarctionDelayed cerebral ischemiaExternal ventricular drainageIntracranial pressureVasospasm

Identifiers

PMID32458277
OpenAlexW3032868417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.