ArticleJournal of neurology2020
A parsimonious score with a free web tool for predicting disability after an ischemic stroke: the Parsifal Score.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost of the models to predict prognosis after an ischemic stroke include complex mathematical equations or too many variables, making them difficult to use in the daily clinic. We want to predict disability 3 months after an ischemic stroke in an independent patient not receiving recanalization treatment within the first 24 h, using a minimum set of variables and an easy tool to facilitate its implementation. As a secondary aim, we calculated the capacity of the score to predict an excellent/devastating outcome and mortality.
methodsEight hundred and forty-four patients were evaluated. A multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to obtain the score. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to estimate disability at the third month. The results were replicated in another independent cohort (378 patients). The "polr" function of R was used to perform the regression, stratifying the sample into seven groups with different cutoffs (from mRS 0 to 6).
resultsThe Parsifal score was generated with: age, previous mRS, initial NIHSS, glycemia on admission, and dyslipidemia. This score predicts disability with an accuracy of 80-76% (discovery-replication cohorts). It has an AUC of 0.86 in the discovery and replication cohort. The specificity was 90-80% (discovery-replication cohorts); while, the sensitivity was 64-74% (discovery-replication cohorts). The prediction of an excellent or devastating outcome, as well as mortality, obtained good discrimination with AUC > 0.80.
conclusionsThe Parsifal Score is a model that predicts disability at the third month, with only five variables, with good discrimination and calibration, and being replicated in an independent cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32458199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.