ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2020
3D human arm reaching movement planning with principal patterns in successive phases.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are observations indicating that the central nervous system (CNS) decomposes a movement into several successive sub-movements as an effective strategy to control the motor task. In this study, we propose an algorithm in which, Arm Reaching Movement (ARM) in 3D space is decomposed into several successive phases using zero joint angle jerk features of the arm kinematic data. The presented decomposition algorithm for 3D motions is, in fact, an improved and generalized version of the decomposition method proposed earlier by Emadi and Bahrami in 2012 for 2D movements. They assumed that the motion is coordinated by minimum jerk characteristics in joint angles space in each phase. However, at the first glance, it seems that in 3D ARM joint angles are not coordinated based on the minimum jerk features. Therefore, we defined a resultant variable in the joint space and showed that one can use its jerk properties together with those of the elbow joint in movement decomposition. We showed that phase borders determined with the proposed algorithm in 3D ARM, are defined with jerk characteristics of ARM's performance variable. We observed the same results in the Sit-to-Stand (STS) movement, too. Thus, based on our results, we suggested that any 3D motion can be decomposed into several phases, such that in each phase a set of principal patterns (PPs) extracted by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method are linearly recruited to regenerate angle trajectories of each joint. Our results also suggest that the CNS, as the primary policy, may simplify the control of the ARMs by reducing the dimension of the control space. This dimension reduction might be accomplished by decomposing the movement into successive phases in which the movement satisfies the minimum joint angle jerk constraint. Then, in each phase, a set of PPs are recruited in the joint space to regenerate angle trajectory of each joint. Then, the dimension of the control space will be the number of the recruitment coefficients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32458184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.