ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2020
In silico identification of new inhibitors for βeta-2-glycoprotein I as a major antigen in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug Repurposing for Targeting ISL LIM Homeobox 2 in Treatment of Endometriosis: A Computational Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2025Article
- Non-Hormonal Therapy for Endometriosis Based on Angiogenesis, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Review
- In silico evidence for prednisone and progesterone efficacy in recurrent implantation failure treatment.Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Article
- Article
- An Overview on Guidelines on COVID-19 Virus and Natural and Assisted Reproductive Techniques Pregnancies.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2020Article
- Emerging Molecular Prospective of SARS-CoV-2: Feasible Nanotechnology Based Detection and Inhibition.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beta 2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) is a major antigen for autoantibodies present in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). β2GPI is a single polypeptide with five repeated domains and different conformations. The activated J-shaped conformation of β2GPI binds to negatively charged phospholipids in the membrane via the fifth domain and causes blood clotting reactions. We applied a drug repurposing strategy using virtual screening and molecular dynamics to find the best FDA drugs against the fifth domain of β2GPI. In the first phase, FDA drugs that had the most favorable ΔG with the fifth domain of β2GPI were selected by virtual screening. Among these drugs that had the most favorable ΔG, Vorapaxar and Antrafenine were selected for molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies. MD simulation was performed to evaluate the stability of Vorapaxar and Antrafenine complexes and the effect of the two drugs on protein conformation. Also, MD simulation was done to investigate the effect of Antrafenine and Vorapaxar on the binding of β2GPI to the platelet model membrane. According to the results, Vorapaxar and Antrafenine were bound to the protein with the favorable binding energy (Vorapaxar and Antrafenine binding energies are - 49.641 and - 38.803 kcal/mol, respectively). In this study, it was shown that unlike protein alone and protein in the Antrafenine complex, the protein in the Vorapaxar complex was completely separated from the model membrane after 350 ns. Moreover, Vorapaxar led to more changes in the activated J-shape of β2GPI. Thus, Vorapaxar can be a suitable candidate for further investigations on the treatment of APS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.