Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458167›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2020

Combining diagnostic memory clinic with rehabilitation follow-up after hip fracture.

Roope Jaatinen, Tiina Luukkaala, Matti Viitanen, Maria S Nuotio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture.European geriatric medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roope JaatinenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Hanneksenrinne 7, 60220, Seinäjoki, Finland. roope.jaatinen@fimnet.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-2699
Tiina LuukkaalaResearch, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
Matti ViitanenDepartment of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria S NuotioDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Hanneksenrinne 7, 60220, Seinäjoki, Finland.
University of Turku · FIKarolinska University Hospital · SETampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCognitive impairment and dementia are common in older hip fracture patients. We describe new diagnoses of cognitive disorders (NDCDs) and associated factors in a two-year post-hip fracture follow-up including the use of the diagnostic facilities of a memory clinic.

methodsData were collected on admission and at outpatient assessment 4-6 months post-hip fracture. Diagnoses of cognitive disorders followed the evidence-based Finnish national care guideline including internationally accepted criteria. NDCDs up to 2 years post-hip fracture were extracted manually from the patient files. Logistic regression models were computed to examine the associations between the pre-fracture factors and the domains of the outpatient geriatric assessment and NDCDs.

resultsOf the 1165 hip fracture patients aged ≥ 65 years, 831 had no previous diagnosis of cognitive disorder. Of these, NDCD was documented in 23.3%. Alzheimer's disease (AD) with or without vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) was the most common diagnosis. Cognitive disorder was usually at a moderate stage. Age, higher ASA score and poor nutritional status on admission were associated with new cognitive disorders. At the outpatient follow-up, poorer activities of daily living and mobility disability were associated with NDCD. Patients with a NDCD were more likely to suffer greater mobility impairment, poorer nutritional status and to have more supported living arrangements at follow-up than in the pre-fracture situation.

conclusionNDCDs are common after hip fracture and associated with impaired rehabilitation outcomes and poor nutritional status. A post-hip fracture assessment co-organized in the form of a memory clinic seems to be feasible to detect previously undiagnosed cognitive disorders. Earlier diagnosis of cognitive disorders is warranted.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesMalnutritionActivities of Daily LivingAgedFollow-Up StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansCognitive disorderHip fractureOlder peoplePhysical functioning

Identifiers

PMID32458167
PMCPMC7438380
OpenAlexW3029969292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.