Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458131›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2020

The work and training situation for young physicians undergoing specialty training in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany: an assessment of the status quo.

Johannes Lermann, Julia Knabl, Johannes Neimann, Kevin Schulte, Kim Proske, Sarah Schott, Matthias Raspe

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Postgraduate medical training in Germany: A narrative review.GMS journal for medical education · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes LermannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen,, Germany. johannes.lermann@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-6999
Julia KnablDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, Hallerwiese Clinic, Nuremberg, Germany.
Johannes NeimannSpecialist in Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 31228, Peine, Germany.
Kevin SchulteDepartment of Internal Medicine IV/Renal and Hypertensive Diseases, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel Campus, Kiel, Germany.
Kim ProskeDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, Hallerwiese Clinic, Nuremberg, Germany.
Sarah Schott *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias Raspe *Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGeneral conditions in the health-care system in Germany have changed dramatically in recent years. Factors affecting this include above all demographic change, rapid developments in diagnostic and therapeutic options, and the application of economic criteria to the health-care sector. This study aimed to establish the current status quo regarding conditions of work and training for young doctors in gynecology and obstetrics, analyze stress factors, and suggest potential improvements.

methodsBetween October 2015 and March 2016, a web-based survey was carried out among residents and members of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics. The electronic questionnaire comprised 65 items on seven topics. Part of the survey included the short version of a validated model of professional gratification crises for analyzing psychosocial work-related stress.

resultsThe analysis included a total of 391 complete datasets. Considerable negative findings in relation to psychosocial work pressure, time and organizational factors, quality of specialty training, and compatibility between work and family life and work and academic tasks were detected. A high level of psychosocial work pressure is associated with more frequent job changes, reduced working hours, poorer health among physicians, and a lower subjectively assessed quality of care.

conclusionsGreater efforts are needed from all the participants involved in patient care to achieve high-quality training and working conditions that allow physicians to work in a healthy and effective way. These aspects are all prerequisites for sustainably maximizing the resource "physician" and for ensuring high-quality patient care.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGermanyGynecologyHumansInternship and ResidencyJob SatisfactionMaleObstetricsPhysiciansPregnancyStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesWork-Life BalanceWorkloadGynecology and obstetricsMedical specialty trainingPsychosocial work pressureStress factorsWorking conditions

Identifiers

PMID32458131
PMCPMC8328906
OpenAlexW3029377143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.