ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2020
Retrospective analysis of different regimens for Chinese adults with severe newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) and ITP Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Modalities.International journal of rheumatology · 2024Review
- A practical guide to the management of immune thrombocytopenia co-existing with acute coronary syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- The Outcomes and Adverse Drug Patterns of Immunomodulators and Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Egyptian Patients with Hemorrhage Comorbidity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Atorvastatin improves bone marrow endothelial progenitor cell function from patients with immune-related hemocytopenia.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To review the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids combined with different regimens for treating severe immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Eighty-five severe ITP patients from 2 tertiary hospitals treated with glucocorticoids were enrolled from January 2018 to May 2019 and divided into 4 treatment groups: group A (treated with glucocorticoids), group B (glucocorticoids plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)), group C (glucocorticoids plus recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO)), and group D (glucocorticoids plus IVIg and rhTPO). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0 software. Early responses and response maintenance were assessed at 14 days and 1 month after treatment. Groups B, C and D had higher complete response (CR) and overall response (OR) rates than group A (P < 0.05). Adverse reaction incidences were not significantly different among all groups (P > 0.05). Severe ITP patients who received glucocorticoids with IVIg and rhTPO had higher CRs and ORs at the platelet level, and no significant adverse reactions were observed. Glucocorticoids combined with different regimens had different clinical efficacies for treating severe ITP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.