Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458091›Full record

Trial reportEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

Executive function training in very preterm children: a randomized controlled trial.

Carolien A van Houdt, Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, Jaap Oosterlaan, Marsh Königs, Corine Koopman-Esseboom, A R Céleste Laarman, Anton H van Kaam, Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolien A van HoudtDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.a.vanhoudt@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-6503
Aleid G van Wassenaer-LeemhuisDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap OosterlaanDepartment of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Neuroscience Group at Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marsh KönigsEmma Neuroscience Group, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Corine Koopman-EsseboomDepartment of Neonatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A R Céleste LaarmanDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anton H van KaamDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-MoensDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emma Kinderziekenhuis · NLHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective of the current study was to assess whether game-formatted executive function (EF) training, is effective in improving attention, EF and academic performance in very preterm and/or extremely low birthweight children aged 8-12 years. A multi-center, double-blind, placebo- and waitlist controlled randomized trial (NTR5365) in two academic hospitals in The Netherlands was performed. Eighty-five very preterm children with parent-rated attention problems on the Child Behavior Checklist were randomized to one of three treatment conditions: EF training, placebo training or waitlist condition. EF or placebo training was completed at home (6 weeks, 25 sessions of 30-45 min each). At baseline, 2 weeks after training or being on the waitlist, and five months after first follow-up visit, children underwent assessments of primary outcomes (parent and teacher ratings of attention) and secondary outcomes (parent and teacher ratings of daily-life EF, computerized EF tasks and academic performance). Linear mixed model analyses were performed for all outcome measures. There were no significant differences in improvement over time on parent- and teacher ratings of attention, parent- and teacher ratings of daily-life EF, computerized EF tasks, and academic performance (arithmetic and reading) between the EF training, placebo training and waitlist condition. In conclusion, game-formatted EF training does not improve attention, EF or academic performance in very preterm children with parent-rated attention problems.

Indexed as

ChildDouble-Blind MethodExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureMaleArithmeticAttentionBehaviorInterventionPrematureReading

Identifiers

PMID32458091
PMCPMC7250540
OpenAlexW3032817441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.