ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2020
Information Processing by Onset Neurons in the Cat Auditory Brainstem.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking hierarchy: the auditory system as an integrated cortical-subcortical network.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- An anatomical and physiological basis for flexible coincidence detection in the auditory system.eLife · 2025Article
- Segregated input to thalamic areas that project differently to core and shell auditory cortical fields.iScience · 2025Article
- Cellular and synaptic specializations for sub-millisecond precision in the mammalian auditory brainstem.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- Mammalian octopus cells are direction selective to frequency sweeps by excitatory synaptic sequence detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Minimal Number of Required Inputs for Temporally Precise Action Potential Generation in Auditory Brainstem Nuclei.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Octopus cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) have been difficult to study because of the very features that distinguish them from other VCN neurons. We performed in vivo recordings in cats on well-isolated units, some of which were intracellularly labeled and histologically reconstructed. We found that responses to low-frequency tones with frequencies < 1 kHz reveal higher levels of neural synchrony and entrainment to the stimulus than the auditory nerve. In responses to higher frequency tones, the neural discharges occur mostly near the stimulus onset. These neurons also respond in a unique way to 100 % amplitude-modulated (AM) tones with discharges exhibiting a bandpass tuning. Responses to frequency-modulated sounds (FM) are unusual: Octopus cells react more vigorously during the ascending than the descending parts of the FM stimulus. We examined responses of neurons in the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLL) whose discharges to tones and AM sounds are similar to octopus cells. Repeated stimulation with short tone pips of VCN and VNLL onset neurons evokes trains of action potentials with gradual shifts toward later times in their first spike latency. This behavior parallels short-term post-synaptic depression observed by other authors in in vitro VCN recordings of octopus cells. VCN and VNLL onset units in cats respond to frozen noise stimuli with gaps as narrow as 1 ms with a robust discharge near the stimulus onset following the gap. This finding suggests that VCN and VNLL onset cells play a role in gap detection, which is of great importance to speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.