Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458082›Full record

ArticleHistory and philosophy of the life sciences2020

Human domestication and the roles of human agency in human evolution.

Lorenzo Del Savio, Matteo Mameli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in History and philosophy of the life sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does the Domestication Syndrome Apply to the Domestic Pig? Not Completely.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorenzo Del SavioLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Matteo MameliDepartment of Philosophy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. matteo.mameli@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6962-8451

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DE 2982/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Are humans a domesticated species? How is this issue related to debates on the roles of human agency in human evolution? This article discusses four views on human domestication: (1) Darwin's view; (2) the view of those who link human domestication to anthropogenic niche construction and, more specifically, to sedentism; (3) the view of those who link human domestication to selection against aggression and the domestication syndrome; and (4) a novel view according to which human domestication can be conceived of in terms of a process of political selection. The article examines and compares these views to illustrate how discussions of human domestication can contribute to debates about how, and to what extent, human agency has affected human evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDomesticationSelection, GeneticHumansAgencyDomesticationHuman evolutionNiche constructionPolitical selectionViolence

Identifiers

PMID32458082
PMCPMC7250791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.