Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458075›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021

The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Pengfei Wang, Utku Kandemir, Binfei Zhang, Chen Fei, Yan Zhuang, Kun Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04660734 (Advantages of 3D Printing in the Management of Acetabular Fractures Fixed by the Kocher Langenbeck Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04660734 nacompletednot on this map

Advantages of 3D Printing in the Management of Acetabular Fractures Fixed by the Kocher Langenbeck Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Tunis El ManarRan2016 to 2019Enrolled109ConditionsAcetabular FractureArmsFractures of the posterior structures of the acetabulum treated by fixation using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Research progress of different surgical approaches in treatment of acetabular both-column fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Review
  11. Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pengfei Wang *Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an JiaoTong University Health Science Center, No. 555, East Friendship Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Utku Kandemir *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Binfei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an JiaoTong University Health Science Center, No. 555, East Friendship Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Chen FeiDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an JiaoTong University Health Science Center, No. 555, East Friendship Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yan ZhuangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an JiaoTong University Health Science Center, No. 555, East Friendship Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an JiaoTong University Health Science Center, No. 555, East Friendship Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 13759994007@163.com.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Honghui Hospital · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the new method including 3D printing-based preoperative planning, surgical workshop, and contouring of the plate versus conventional method in the surgical treatment of complex acetabular fractures.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data in a cohort of 88 patients of complex acetabular fracture with mean 29.95 ± 4.84 months (24-41 months) follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisting of 41 patients were performed previewed surgery with a 3D printing-based pre-contoured plate on a 3D printing model. Group 2, comprised of 47 patients, were treated by the traditional contoured plate technique. The quality of reduction was assessed using criteria described by Matta. Functional outcome was evaluated using Modified Postel Merle D'Aubigne score. A custom-made quiz was used to evaluate the chief assistant.

resultsThe study showed no significant differences in measured preoperative variables except for the age between the Group 1 and Group 2 (p > 0.05). Compared with the Group 2, the intraoperative blood loss, operative time was significantly decreased in Group 1 (p < 0.05). There were no significant statistical differences in the quality of reduction and Modified Postel Merle D'Aubigne score (p > 0.05). The result of evaluation of assistant in Group 1 was significantly high than in Group 2 (p < 0.05).

conclusion3D printing-based pre-contoured plate is a more effective and reliable method than traditional contoured plate technique for treating the complex acetabular fractures. Meanwhile, the 3D printing is a useful orthopedic surgical education tool which can improve the understanding of the complex acetabular fracture for a young surgeon.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAcetabulumHip FracturesHumansOrthopedic ProceduresPreoperative CareRetrospective Studies3D printingAcetabulumFracturesInternal fixationPlate

Identifiers

PMID32458075
OpenAlexW3031441200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.