ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021
[New techniques for quantification of color vision in disorders of cone function : Cambridge color test and photoreceptor-specific temporal contrast sensitivity in patients with heterozygous RP1L1 and RPGR mutations].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photoreceptor-Specific Temporal Contrast Sensitivities in RP1L1-Associated Occult Macular Dystrophy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Chromatic discrimination measures in mature observers depend on the response window.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInherited retinal diseases with cone dysfunction can be accompanied by severe visual loss and a marked loss of color vision despite relatively normal fundus appearance. Autosomal dominant occult macular dystrophy (RP1L1 gene) and X‑chromosomal retinitis pigmentosa (RPGR gene, including heterozygous female carriers) are important examples. New examination techniques enable quantification of the extent of color vision disturbances.
methodsAfter a thorough clinical examination, color discrimination and cone function were quantified. The Cambridge color test is a computer-based test that generates pseudo-isochromatic plates with Landolt C figures for quantifying color discrimination along several axes in color space. Examination of photorecepor-specific temporal contrast sensitivity is performed by subtle cyclic modulation of the spectral composition of a light stimulus. Molecular diagnostics were carried out by next generation sequencing (NGS)-based targeted gene panel analysis and Sanger sequencing.
resultsMarkedly reduced color discrimination as well as reduced photoreceptor-specific temporal contrast sensitivity could be demonstrated in two patients with occult macular dystrophy and two heterozygous female carriers of RPGR mutations.
conclusionThe demonstration of dyschromatopsia is very helpful in the diagnosis of inherited retinal diseases, in addition to modern imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescence. New functional techniques enable quantification of color vision disturbances and could be useful as outcome parameters in clinical trials of new gene and stem cell-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.