ArticleHeart and vessels2020
Left bundle branch area. A new site for physiological pacing: a pilot study.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated Meta-Analysis of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Conduction System Disorders: Insights From New Evidence.Clinical cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of conduction system and right ventricular pacing in bradyarrhythmia indications: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched and randomized studies.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Left bundle branch area pacing or conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: an Electrophysiology-guided tailored approach.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Myocardial work parameters in left bundle branch area pacing versus other pacing techniques: a systematic review and aggregate comparative analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Review
- Enhancing cardiac pacing strategies: a review of conduction system pacing compared with right and biventricular pacing and their influence on myocardial function.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Review
- Anatomical and histological assessment of left bundle branch area pacing in human heart with refractory heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Evaluation of clinical safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in comparison with right ventricular septal pacing.Medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Comparison with Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients with High Ventricular Pacing Ratio ≥40.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Optimization of Left Ventricle Pace Maker Location Using Echo-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Models.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic RV pacing may lead to pacing induced cardiomyopathy in some patients and results in a higher risk of development of LV systolic dysfunction, heart failure, mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. His bundle pacing emerged as the most physiologic form of ventricular pacing. However, wide adoption of this technique in routine clinical practice is limited by higher capture thresholds at implant sometimes, lower R wave amplitudes, atrial over sensing and increased risk for late rise in pacing thresholds (resulting in the need for lead revisions). Some recent studies have focused on left bundle branch area pacing as a solution to these problems. In our study, we have compared left bundle branch area pacing (in 22 patients) with conventional right ventricular apical pacing (in 28 patients) who presented to us with conventional indications for pacemaker implantations in term of procedure and fluoroscopy time and short-term lead performance and left ventricular function. The results of our study showed that left bundle branch area pacing is associated with shortened QRS duration (22.36 ± 9.36 ms) and better LV function (higher left ventricular ejection fraction 64.00 ± 3.03 vs. 59.73 ± 6.73 with a p value of 0.013 and lower left ventricular diastolic internal diameter 4.58 ± 0.32 vs. 5.23 ± 0.40 cm with a p value of < 0.001) in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing. The total procedure time and fluoroscopy time was similar (63.15 ± 7.02 vs. 55.15 ± 6.16 min, p value 0.142 and 6.08 ± 1.42 vs. 5.06 ± 1.30 min, p value 0.332 respectively) in left bundle branch area pacing group. The results of this study indicate that left bundle branch area pacing may be an option for physiological pacing in patients requiring a high percentage of ventricular pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.