Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32458055›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2020

Left bundle branch area. A new site for physiological pacing: a pilot study.

Asit Das, Sk Sahidul Islam, Sushant Kumar Pathak, Ishita Majumdar, Shah Alam Sharwar, Ranita Saha, Suman Chatterjee

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Left bundle branch area pacing or conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: an Electrophysiology-guided tailored approach.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Asit DasDepartment of Cardiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India. dradascard@rediffmail.com.
Sk Sahidul IslamDepartment of Cardiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Sushant Kumar PathakDepartment of Cardiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Ishita MajumdarDepartment of Cardiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Shah Alam SharwarDepartment of Cardiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Ranita SahaDepartment of Cardiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Suman ChatterjeeB.M Birla Heart Research Centre, Kolkata, India.
Bose Institute · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic RV pacing may lead to pacing induced cardiomyopathy in some patients and results in a higher risk of development of LV systolic dysfunction, heart failure, mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. His bundle pacing emerged as the most physiologic form of ventricular pacing. However, wide adoption of this technique in routine clinical practice is limited by higher capture thresholds at implant sometimes, lower R wave amplitudes, atrial over sensing and increased risk for late rise in pacing thresholds (resulting in the need for lead revisions). Some recent studies have focused on left bundle branch area pacing as a solution to these problems. In our study, we have compared left bundle branch area pacing (in 22 patients) with conventional right ventricular apical pacing (in 28 patients) who presented to us with conventional indications for pacemaker implantations in term of procedure and fluoroscopy time and short-term lead performance and left ventricular function. The results of our study showed that left bundle branch area pacing is associated with shortened QRS duration (22.36 ± 9.36 ms) and better LV function (higher left ventricular ejection fraction 64.00 ± 3.03 vs. 59.73 ± 6.73 with a p value of 0.013 and lower left ventricular diastolic internal diameter 4.58 ± 0.32 vs. 5.23 ± 0.40 cm with a p value of < 0.001) in comparison to right ventricular apical pacing. The total procedure time and fluoroscopy time was similar (63.15 ± 7.02 vs. 55.15 ± 6.16 min, p value 0.142 and 6.08 ± 1.42 vs. 5.06 ± 1.30 min, p value 0.332 respectively) in left bundle branch area pacing group. The results of this study indicate that left bundle branch area pacing may be an option for physiological pacing in patients requiring a high percentage of ventricular pacing.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsHeart RateAgedBundle of HisCardiac Pacing, ArtificialFemaleHeart BlockHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsStroke VolumeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftVentricular Function, RightHis bundle pacingLeft bundle branch area pacingPhysiological pacing

Identifiers

PMID32458055
OpenAlexW3031391904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.