Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457853›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2020

Adolescent Health: A Framework for Developing an Innovative Personalized Well-Being Index.

Francesca Mastorci, Luca Bastiani, Cristina Doveri, Gabriele Trivellini, Anselmo Casu, Cristina Vassalle, Alessandro Pingitore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gender Differences for Health Indicators in a Sample of School Dropout Adolescents: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Well-Being Perception during COVID-19 Pandemic in Healthy Adolescents: From the Avatar Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca MastorciClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Luca BastianiClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Cristina DoveriClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriele TrivelliniClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Anselmo CasuClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Cristina VassalleFondazione G. Monasterio, Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro PingitoreClinical Physiology Institute, CNR, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is not only typically considered a time of good health but also characterized by an emergence of risk factors that may have long-term consequences for well-being that represents strong predictors of adverse health outcomes. The aim of the study is to assess adolescence well-being through the development of an integrated Well-Being Index (WBI) including variables of lifestyle habits, social context, emotional status, and mental skills. One thousand two hundred forty-eight healthy adolescents (Female 48%; Male 52%; mean age 13 years) were recruited from five Italian junior high schools, by KIDSCREEN-52 and cognitive processing using the Stroop Test. School performance was estimated by questions concerning the scholastic achievement. Social context was the most important predictor of perceived well-being (β = 0.972, SE = 0.014,

Indexed as

adolescenceemotionhealthpersonalized well-beingpreventionschoolsocial context

Identifiers

PMID32457853
PMCPMC7223052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.