Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457815›Full record

ArticleApplied research in quality of life2020

Identifying

Cornelia Strecker, Alexandra Huber, Thomas Höge, Melanie Hausler, Stefan Höfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied research in quality of life, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The perceived work environment and well-being: A survey of emergency health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cornelia StreckerInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexandra HuberDepartment of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas HögeInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Melanie HauslerDepartment of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan HöferInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most of their work settings, the health and well-being of hospital physicians are at risk. Trends of work intensification and changing laws in the European Union and beyond have heightened the call for taking a closer look at the workplace and training conditions of hospital physicians. This study aims to identify specific work characteristics (such as autonomy, social support, cognitive demands, and skill adequacy), in order to determine conditions for the applicability of individual character strengths at work and in turn for increased work engagement and well-being. We examined our hypotheses based on cross-sectional (

Indexed as

Applicability of signature character strengthsAutonomyWell-beingWork characteristicsWork engagement

Identifiers

PMID32457815
PMCPMC7250643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.