Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457785›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

To Lead or to Follow: Contribution of the Plant Vacuole to Cell Growth.

Sabrina Kaiser, David Scheuring

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measurement of Net NHBio-protocol · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Map-based cloning of ZmSS5, construction and validation of its regulatory pathway for maize kernel weight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The fate and function of theFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Salicylic acid: new pathways arising?Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in big data · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina KaiserPlant Pathology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
David ScheuringPlant Pathology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
University of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell division and cell elongation are fundamental processes for growth. In contrast to animal cells, plant cells are surrounded by rigid walls and therefore loosening of the wall is required during elongation. On the other hand, vacuole size has been shown to correlate with cell size and inhibition of vacuolar expansion limits cell growth. However, the specific role of the vacuole during cell elongation is still not fully resolved. Especially the question whether the vacuole is the leading unit during cellular growth or just passively expands upon water uptake remains to be answered. Here, we review recent findings about the contribution of the vacuole to cell elongation. In addition, we also discuss the connection between cell wall status and vacuolar morphology. In particular, we focus on the question whether vacuolar size is dictated by cell size or

Indexed as

actinauxincell elongationcell sizecell wallcytoskeletonturgorvacuole

Identifiers

PMID32457785
PMCPMC7227418
OpenAlexW3021994198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.