Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457734›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2020

Prevalence and Incidence of Non-neutralizing Antibodies in Congenital Hemophilia A- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A Abdi, M R Bordbar, S Hassan, F R Rosendaal, J G van der Bom, J Voorberg, K Fijnvandraat, S C Gouw

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Evolution of Hemophilia Therapeutics: An Illustrated Review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Performance of a clinical risk prediction model for inhibitor formation in severe haemophilia A.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2021
    Article
  13. Nonneutralizing Antibodies in Haemophilia A Patients: To Be Ignored or Not to Be!Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A AbdiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M R BordbarHematology Research Center, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
S HassanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
F R RosendaalDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
J G van der BomDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
J VoorbergDepartment of Molecular Cellular Hemostasis, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
K FijnvandraatDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
S C GouwDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLSanquin · NLShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesFactor VIIIFemaleHemophilia AHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceAutoantibodiesF8 protein, humanFactor VIIIADA assayanti-drug antibodiesFIXFVIIIhemophiliainhibitorsnon-neutralizing antibodies

Identifiers

PMID32457734
PMCPMC7221178
OpenAlexW3021323304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.