Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457412›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Global priorities for conservation of reptilian phylogenetic diversity in the face of human impacts.

Rikki Gumbs, Claudia L Gray, Monika Böhm, Michael Hoffmann, Richard Grenyer, Walter Jetz, Shai Meiri, Uri Roll, Nisha R Owen, James Rosindell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring gaps, biases, and research priorities in the evidence for reptile conservation actions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Global dynamics of functional composition in CITES-traded reptiles.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rikki GumbsDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK. r.gumbs@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-8549
Claudia L GrayEDGE of Existence Programme, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-7185
Monika BöhmInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-0832
Michael HoffmannConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-2254
Richard GrenyerSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
Walter JetzEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-7277
Shai MeiriSchool of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Uri RollMitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, 8499000, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-1164
Nisha R OwenOn The EDGE Conservation, 152a Walton St, Chelsea, London, SW3 2JJ, UK.
James RosindellDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-9346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic diversity measures are increasingly used in conservation planning to represent aspects of biodiversity beyond that captured by species richness. Here we develop two new metrics that combine phylogenetic diversity and the extent of human pressure across the spatial distribution of species - one metric valuing regions and another prioritising species. We evaluate these metrics for reptiles, which have been largely neglected in previous studies, and contrast these results with equivalent calculations for all terrestrial vertebrate groups. We find that regions under high human pressure coincide with the most irreplaceable areas of reptilian diversity, and more than expected by chance. The highest priority reptile species score far above the top mammal and bird species, and reptiles include a disproportionate number of species with insufficient extinction risk data. Data Deficient species are, in terms of our species-level metric, comparable to Critically Endangered species and therefore may require urgent conservation attention.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesPhylogenyReptilesAnimal DistributionAnimalsEndangered SpeciesExtinction, BiologicalHumansRiskSpecies SpecificityVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID32457412
PMCPMC7250838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.