Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457381›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Electric Fields at Breast Cancer and Cancer Cell Collective Galvanotaxis.

Kan Zhu, Nicholas R Hum, Brian Reid, Qin Sun, Gabriela G Loots, Min Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Macrophages sense and follow physiologically relevant KCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Hydrogel Design to Understand and Guide 3D Cell Migration.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Physical principles and mechanisms of cell migration.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An Update on Implant-Associated Malignancies and Their Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biophysical control of plasticity and patterning in regeneration and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kan ZhuInstitute for Regenerative Cures, Departments of Dermatology, Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Nicholas R HumPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Brian ReidInstitute for Regenerative Cures, Departments of Dermatology, Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Qin SunInstitute for Regenerative Cures, Departments of Dermatology, Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Gabriela G LootsPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA. loots1@llnl.gov.
Min ZhaoInstitute for Regenerative Cures, Departments of Dermatology, Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. minzhao@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer growth interferes with local ionic environments, membrane potentials, and transepithelial potentials, resulting in small electrical changes in the tumor microenvironment. Electrical fields (EFs) have significant effects on cancer cell migration (galvanotaxis/electrotaxis), however, their role as a regulator of cancer progression and metastasis is poorly understood. Here, we employed unique probe systems to characterize the electrical properties of cancer cells and their migratory ability under an EF. Subcutaneous tumors were established from a triple-negative murine breast cancer cell line (4T1), electric currents and potentials of tumors were measured using vibrating probe and glass microelectrodes, respectively. Steady outward and inward currents could be detected at different positions on the tumor surface and magnitudes of the electric currents on the tumor surface strongly correlated with tumor weights. Potential measurements also showed the non-homogeneous intratumor electric potentials. Cancer cell migration was then surveyed in the presence of EFs in vitro. Parental 4T1 cells and metastatic sublines in isolation showed random migration in EFs of physiological strength, whereas cells in monolayer migrated collectively to the anode. Our data contribute to an improved understanding of breast cancer metastasis, providing new evidence in support of an electrical mechanism that promotes this phenomenon.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMembrane PotentialsMiceMicroelectrodesNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm TransplantationTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor BurdenTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32457381
PMCPMC7250931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.