Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32457143›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Modulation of hippocampal brain networks produces changes in episodic simulation and divergent thinking.

Preston P Thakral, Kevin P Madore, Sarah E Kalinowski, Daniel L Schacter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Constructive Memory and Conscious Experience.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Preston P ThakralDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; prestonthakral@fas.harvard.edu dls@wjh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6603-6186
Kevin P MadoreDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Sarah E KalinowskiDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0003-3543-248X
Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; prestonthakral@fas.harvard.edu dls@wjh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-6061

Funding

EVENT RELATED NEUROIMAGING OF HUMAN MEMORY FORMATIONR01MH060941 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 2000 to 2025
$9.5M
Interactions between goals, attention, and memory in younger and older adultsF32AG059341 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADORE, KEVIN PAUL · 2018 to 2021
$222k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG059341NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies indicate that a core network of brain regions, including the hippocampus, is jointly recruited during episodic memory, episodic simulation, and divergent creative thinking. Because fMRI data are correlational, it is unknown whether activity increases in the hippocampus, and the core network more broadly, play a causal role in episodic simulation and divergent thinking. Here we employed fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whether temporary disruption of hippocampal brain networks impairs both episodic simulation and divergent thinking. For each of two TMS sessions, continuous θ-burst stimulation (cTBS) was applied to either a control site (vertex) or to a left angular gyrus target region. The target region was identified on the basis of a participant-specific resting-state functional connectivity analysis with a hippocampal seed region previously associated with memory, simulation, and divergent thinking. Following cTBS, participants underwent fMRI and performed a simulation, divergent thinking, and nonepisodic control task. cTBS to the target region reduced the number of episodic details produced for the simulation task and reduced idea production on divergent thinking. Performance in the control task did not statistically differ as a function of cTBS site. fMRI analyses revealed a selective and simultaneous reduction in hippocampal activity during episodic simulation and divergent thinking following cTBS to the angular gyrus versus vertex but not during the nonepisodic control task. Our findings provide evidence that hippocampal-targeted TMS can specifically modulate episodic simulation and divergent thinking, and suggest that the hippocampus is critical for these cognitive functions.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMemory, EpisodicThinkingAdultFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTheta RhythmTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationcreativityepisodic memoryfMRIimaginationTMS

Identifiers

PMID32457143
PMCPMC7293701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.