Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456709›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2020

CK20 versus AMACR and p53 immunostains in evaluation of Urothelial Carcinoma in Situ and Reactive Atypia.

Daniel J Neal, Mahul B Amin, Steven C Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J NealDepartment of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, PO Box 980662, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Mahul B AminDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Steven C SmithDepartment of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, PO Box 980662, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. steven.c.smith@vcuhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-4607
Virginia Commonwealth University · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancillary testing with immunohistochemistry has shown recent promise in the workup of equivocal bladder lesions. We read with interest the recent findings of Alston et al., who assessed the diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in comparison to cytokeratin 20 (CK20) in evaluation of atypia in challenging flat urothelial lesions in the differential between carcinoma in situ (CIS) and reactive atypia. AMACR was reported to be a somewhat more specific but less sensitive marker for CIS than CK20, though showing weaker intensity. Spurred by their report, with the knowledge that we had consistently and consecutively performed AMACR, CK20, and p53 on flat urothelial lesions challenging enough to reach intradepartmental consensus, we performed a retrospective review. Similarly, we found that AMACR was less sensitive (80%) and more specific (100%) than CK20, with the same caveat of less staining intensity. Additionally, our p53 review identified a significant rate (~ 27%) of equivocal/non-informative findings. Taken together, our experience in this consecutive cohort confirms the impression of Alston et al. regarding the utility and challenges of AMACR use, while highlighting challenges with p53, which we plan to use more sparingly prospectively.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratin-20MaleMiddle AgedRacemases and EpimerasesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTumor Suppressor Protein p53Urinary Bladder Neoplasmsalpha-methylacyl-CoA racemaseBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-20KRT20 protein, humanRacemases and EpimerasesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemaseCytokeratin 20Urothelial carcinoma in situ

Identifiers

PMID32456709
PMCPMC7251721
OpenAlexW3031324509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.