Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456625›Full record

SynthesisBMC microbiology2020

Effect of donor-recipient relatedness on the plasmid conjugation frequency: a meta-analysis.

Jesse B Alderliesten, Sarah J N Duxbury, Mark P Zwart, J Arjan G M de Visser, Arjan Stegeman, Egil A J Fischer

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Climate change and antimicrobial resistance.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Phenotypic and Genetic Characteristics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CharacterizingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The extended mobility of plasmids.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jesse B AlderliestenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.b.alderliesten@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1132-4310
Sarah J N DuxburyLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mark P ZwartDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Arjan G M de VisserLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Arjan StegemanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Egil A J FischerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLWageningen University & Research · NLNetherlands Institute of Ecology · NL

Funding

ZonMw 50-54100-98-1 19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConjugation plays a major role in the transmission of plasmids encoding antibiotic resistance genes in both clinical and general settings. The conjugation efficiency is influenced by many biotic and abiotic factors, one of which is the taxonomic relatedness between donor and recipient bacteria. A comprehensive overview of the influence of donor-recipient relatedness on conjugation is still lacking, but such an overview is important to quantitatively assess the risk of plasmid transfer and the effect of interventions which limit the spread of antibiotic resistance, and to obtain parameter values for conjugation in mathematical models. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on reported conjugation frequencies from Escherichia coli donors to various recipient species.

resultsThirty-two studies reporting 313 conjugation frequencies for liquid broth matings and 270 conjugation frequencies for filter matings were included in our meta-analysis. The reported conjugation frequencies varied over 11 orders of magnitude. Decreasing taxonomic relatedness between donor and recipient bacteria, when adjusted for confounding factors, was associated with a lower conjugation frequency in liquid matings. The mean conjugation frequency for bacteria of the same order, the same class, and other classes was 10, 20, and 789 times lower than the mean conjugation frequency within the same species, respectively. This association between relatedness and conjugation frequency was not found for filter matings. The conjugation frequency was furthermore found to be influenced by temperature in both types of mating experiments, and in addition by plasmid incompatibility group in liquid matings, and by recipient origin and mating time in filter matings.

conclusionsIn our meta-analysis, taxonomic relatedness is limiting conjugation in liquid matings, but not in filter matings, suggesting that taxonomic relatedness is not a limiting factor for conjugation in environments where bacteria are fixed in space.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaConjugation, GeneticDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsPhylogenyPlasmidsSpecies SpecificityEscherichia coli ProteinsAntibiotic resistanceEscherichia coliHorizontal gene transferPlasmid

Identifiers

PMID32456625
PMCPMC7249681
OpenAlexW3029657303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.