Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456612›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Comparative genomic analysis of 142 bacteriophages infecting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica.

Ruimin Gao, Sohail Naushad, Sylvain Moineau, Roger Levesque, Lawrence Goodridge, Dele Ogunremi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prophage diversity in poultry-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Analyses of Bacteriophage Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Screening of PotentialFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruimin GaoOttawa Laboratory Fallowfield, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ruimin.gao@canada.ca.
Sohail NaushadOttawa Laboratory Fallowfield, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sylvain MoineauFélix d'Hérelle Reference Center for Bacterial Viruses, Faculté de médecine dentaire, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Roger LevesqueInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Lawrence GoodridgePresent Address:Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Dele OgunremiOttawa Laboratory Fallowfield, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. dele.ogunremi@canada.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-5574
Canadian Food Inspection Agency · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

Canadian Food Inspection Agency Not applicableCanadian Security Science Program of the Department of National Defence CSSP-2017-CP-2312Genome Canada Genome Canada Salmonella SystOmics project Applicatin 8505Genome Canada Genome Canada Salmonella SystOmics project Application 8505Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacteriophages are bacterial parasites and are considered the most abundant and diverse biological entities on the planet. Previously we identified 154 prophages from 151 serovars of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. A detailed analysis of Salmonella prophage genomics is required given the influence of phages on their bacterial hosts and should provide a broader understanding of Salmonella biology and virulence and contribute to the practical applications of phages as vectors and antibacterial agents.

resultsHere we provide a comparative analysis of the full genome sequences of 142 prophages of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica which is the full complement of the prophages that could be retrieved from public databases. We discovered extensive variation in genome sizes (ranging from 6.4 to 358.7 kb) and guanine plus cytosine (GC) content (ranging from 35.5 to 65.4%) and observed a linear correlation between the genome size and the number of open reading frames (ORFs). We used three approaches to compare the phage genomes. The NUCmer/MUMmer genome alignment tool was used to evaluate linkages and correlations based on nucleotide identity between genomes. Multiple sequence alignment was performed to calculate genome average nucleotide identity using the Kalgin program. Finally, genome synteny was explored using dot plot analysis. We found that 90 phage genome sequences grouped into 17 distinct clusters while the remaining 52 genomes showed no close relationships with the other phage genomes and are identified as singletons. We generated genome maps using nucleotide and amino acid sequences which allowed protein-coding genes to be sorted into phamilies (phams) using the Phamerator software. Out of 5796 total assigned phamilies, one phamily was observed to be dominant and was found in 49 prophages, or 34.5% of the 142 phages in our collection. A majority of the phamilies, 4330 out of 5796 (74.7%), occurred in just one prophage underscoring the high degree of diversity among Salmonella bacteriophages.

conclusionsBased on nucleotide and amino acid sequences, a high diversity was found among Salmonella bacteriophages which validate the use of prophage sequence analysis as a highly discriminatory subtyping tool for Salmonella. Thorough understanding of the conservation and variation of prophage genomic characteristics will facilitate their rational design and use as tools for bacterial strain construction, vector development and as anti-bacterial agents.

Indexed as

GenomicsBacteriophagesBiodiversityEvolution, MolecularGenome, ViralNucleotidesOpen Reading FramesSalmonella entericaNucleotidesBacteriophageComparative genomicsNucleotide identityPhage clustersPhameratorProphage sequence typingSalmonella enterica

Identifiers

PMID32456612
PMCPMC7251866
OpenAlexW3030304545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.