ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From the Washington Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and hospital factors associated with 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Cardiometabolic Mortality and Health System Expansion in Kuwait (2010-2022): A National Time-Series Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impella vs. IABP in Non-emergent High-Risk PCI: Outcomes and LVEF Recovery from a Large US EHR Study.Cardiology and therapy · 2026Article
- Trends in cardiac surgery and percutaneous interventions in New York: a statewide registry analysis (2010-2019).BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- Nationwide trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable ischemic heart disease in end-stage kidney disease: a longitudinal study.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Evolution of the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Indication and Mortality Rates in Spain from 2010 to 2019.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Hybrid Training for Interventional Critical Care, Complex Coronary Interventions, and Interventional Heart Failure: Is it the Right Time?JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Considering Initial "PCI Turndown" as a Risk Factor for Subsequent PCI.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Contemporary Risk Models for In-Hospital and 30-Day Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Temporal Trend in Revascularization for Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Challenges and Burdens in the Coronary Artery Disease Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.Korean circulation journal · 2023Review
- The impact of on-site cardiac surgical backup on clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome-analysis of the ACSIS national registry.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis on coronary revascularization outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2018.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
- Practice Pattern Variation in Adoption of New and Evolving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology and Outcomes of Endothelium Function in Coronary Microvascular Diseases: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Multicenter Study.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Left Main Coronary Artery Disease-Current Management and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Rates of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in England and Wales: Impact of COURAGE and ORBITA Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Patient selection and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have changed over the past decade. However, there is limited information on outcomes for both revascularization strategies in the same population. The study evaluated temporal changes in risk profile, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes for PCI- and CABG-treated patients. Methods and Results We analyzed all PCI and isolated CABG between 2005 and 2017 in nonfederal hospitals in Washington State. Descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate temporal changes in risk profile and, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Over the study period, 178 474 PCI and 36 592 CABG procedures were performed. PCI and CABG volume decreased by 2.9% and 22.6%, respectively. Compared with 2005-2009, patients receiving either form of revascularization between 2014 and 2017 had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including diabetes mellitus and hypertension and dialysis. Presentation with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (17% versus 20%) and cardiogenic shock (2.4% versus 3.4%) increased for patients with PCI compared with CABG. Conversely, clinical acuity decreased for patients receiving CABG over the study period. From 2005 to 2017, mean National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI mortality score increased for patients treated with PCI (20.1 versus 22.4,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.