ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute phenylcapsaicin supplementation improves CrossFit® performance: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Trial
- Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Exploring handstand walking biomechanics and shoulder pain.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Time-Course of Recovery Following a Strength-Power Emphasized CrossfitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Highest oxygen consumption prediction by forced vital capacity in athletes.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Psychobehavioral profiles, competitive progression, and nutritional characteristics in CrossFit® athletes across a national competitive season.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Integrative Physiological Strategies for Monitoring Demands in Functional Fitness.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploratory Analysis of the Correlations Between Physiological and Biomechanical Variables and Performance in the CrossFitJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Workout Duration Alters the Importance of Predictive Traits on High-Intensity Functional Training Workout Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Highest oxygen consumption prediction: introducing variable theoretical proportional factors for different sports.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- Acute physiological responses and performance determinants in HyroxFrontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.European journal of translational myology · 2024Article
- Comparison between Measured and Predicted Resting Metabolic Rate Equations in Cross-Training Practitioners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Physical and Physiological Characteristics of Elite CrossFit Athletes.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Comparison of VOSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in CrossfitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Editorial: Functional fitness/high intensity functional training for health and performance.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the physiological variables that predict competition performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male amateur CrossFit athletes (age, 35 ± 9 years; CrossFit experience, 40 ± 27 months) performed a series of laboratory-based tests (incremental load test for deep full squat and bench press; squat, countermovement and drop jump tests; and incremental running and Wingate tests) that were studied as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and we assessed the relationship between the laboratory-based markers and CrossFit performance with regression analyses. Overall CrossFit performance (i.e., final ranking considering the sum of all WODs, as assessed by number of repetitions, time spent in exercises or weight lifted) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the deep full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.