Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456227›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Polyvalent Phage CoNShP-3 as a Natural Antimicrobial Agent Showing Lytic and Antibiofilm Activities against Antibiotic-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Strains.

Ahmed R Sofy, Naglaa F Abd El Haliem, Ehab E Refaey, Ahmed A Hmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring biosurfactant fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Alternatives to Fight Vancomycin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed R SofyBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, 11884 Cairo, Egypt.
Naglaa F Abd El HaliemMicrobiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine (Girls), Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, 11884 Cairo, Egypt.
Ehab E RefaeyBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, 11884 Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed A HmedBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, 11884 Cairo, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic antimicrobials have a negative impact on food quality and consumer health, which is why natural antimicrobials are urgently needed. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) has gained considerable importance for food poisoning and infection in humans and animals, particularly in biofilms. As a result, this study was conducted to control the CoNS isolated from food samples in Egypt. CoNS isolates were selected on the basis of their antibiotic susceptibility profiles and their biofilm-associated behavior. In this context, a total of 29 different bacteriophages were isolated and, in particular, lytic phages (6 isolates) were selected. The host range and physiological parameters of the lytic phages have been studied. Electron microscopy images showed that lytic phages were members of the families

Indexed as

antibiofilm activityantibiotic-resistancebacteriophagescoagulase-negative StaphylococcusCoNScoNShP-3foodborne bacteriafood safetynatural antimicrobialsphage biocontrol

Identifiers

PMID32456227
PMCPMC7278617
OpenAlexW3026957478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.