Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456099›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review.

Mohammad Alarifi, Timothy Patrick, Abdulrahman Jabour, Min Wu, Jake Luo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Proposed Questions to Assess the Extent of Knowledge in Understanding the Radiology Report Language.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad AlarifiCollege of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-2367
Timothy PatrickCollege of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.
Abdulrahman JabourHealth Informatics Department, Faculty of Public Health and Tropical Medicine at Jazan University, Jazan, SA 45142, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1397-582X
Min WuCollege of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.
Jake LuoCollege of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study discusses the gap between the patient web portal and providing a full radiology report. A literature review was conducted to examine radiologists, physicians, and patients' opinions and preferences of providing patients with online access radiology reports. The databases searched were Pubmed and Google Scholar and the initial search included 927 studies. After review, 47 studies were included in the study. We identified several themes, including patients' understanding of radiology reports and radiological images, as well as the need for decreasing the turnaround time for reports availability. The existing radiology reports written for physicians are not suited for patients. Further studies are needed to guide and inform the design of patient friendly radiology reports. One of the ways that can be used to fill the gap between patients and radiology reports is using social media sites.

Indexed as

Patient PortalsRadiologyAccess to InformationHumansRadiographyfull radiologypatient web portalquality health careradiology reportreportsocial media platforms

Identifiers

PMID32456099
PMCPMC7277373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.