Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456054›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Conceptual and Methodological Mayhem of "Screen Time".

Linda K Kaye, Amy Orben, David A Ellis, Simon C Hunter, Stephen Houghton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06402253 (Social Media Artistic tRaining in Teenagers), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06402253 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Social Media Artistic tRaining in Teenagers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled61ConditionsHealthy Subjects, Mental Health IssueArmsMusic composition / edition, Photography composition / edition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to Reduce Screen Time in Preschool-Aged Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Measurement of screen time among young children aged 0-6 years: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda K KayeDepartment of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7687-5071
Amy OrbenEmmanuel College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3AP, UK.
David A EllisSchool of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6172-3323
Simon C HunterDepartment of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3922-1252
Stephen HoughtonGraduate School of Education, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debates concerning the impacts of screen time are widespread. Existing research presents mixed findings, and lacks longitudinal evidence for any causal or long-term effects. We present a critical account of the current shortcomings of the screen time literature. These include poor conceptualisation, the use of non-standardised measures that are predominantly self-report, and issues with measuring screen time over time and context. Based on these issues, we make a series of recommendations as a basis for furthering academic and public debate. These include drawing on a user-focused approach in order to seek the various affordances gained from "screen use". Within this, we can better understand the way in which these vary across time and context, and make distinction between objective measures of "screen time" compared to those more subjective experiences of uses or affordances, and the differential impacts these may bring.

Indexed as

Screen TimeHumansaffordancesmethodsscreen timescreen useself-reportssocial mediawell-being

Identifiers

PMID32456054
PMCPMC7277381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.