ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Answer-locked ERP dynamics during arithmetic verification in children with developmental dyscalculia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Reading Ability and Mental Health: Mediating Roles of Depressive Symptoms and Behavior Problems in Chinese School-Age Children.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validation and Reliability of the Dyslexia Adult Checklist in Screening for Dyslexia.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2025Article
- Improving cognitive function in Chinese children with ADHD and/or RD through computerized working memory training.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Association between parenting styles and dyslexia in primary school students: the mediating role of home literacy environment.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Early biomarkers of neurodevelopmental disorders in preterm infants: protocol for a longitudinal cohort study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Self-Concept in Primary School Student with Dyslexia: The Relationship to Parental Rearing Styles.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Prevalence of Dyslexia in Primary School Children and Their Chinese Literacy Assessment in Shantou, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in different regions. This study was aimed at analyzing the reliability and validity of the self-developed Chinese dyslexia assessment tool named Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT), which was suitable for students of grade 3 to 5 in primary school. We randomly selected three primary schools in Shantou city of China, including two in the central district and one in the surrounding district. A total of 1492 students of grades 3 through 5 were recruited. We assessed the reliability of CRAT by test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The validity assessment was realized by discriminant validity, content validity and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For reliability, the test-retest correlation coefficient of the total score of the CRAT was 0.671. The difference between the test-retest was not statistically significant. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the CRAT was 0.75. For validity, the correlation coefficient between the score of each subscale and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.29 to 0.73. The indexes of the three structural equation models all meet the standard (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.