Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32455950›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Polish Propolis-Chemical Composition and Biological Effects in Tongue Cancer Cells and Macrophages.

Joanna Wezgowiec, Anna Wieczynska, Wlodzimierz Wieckiewicz, Julita Kulbacka, Jolanta Saczko, Natalia Pachura, Mieszko Wieckiewicz, Roman Gancarz, Kazimiera A Wilk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Ameliorative effects of propolis upon reproductive toxicity in males.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joanna WezgowiecDepartment of Experimental Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7077-1327
Anna WieczynskaDepartment of Engineering and Technology of Chemical Processes, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9569-900X
Wlodzimierz WieckiewiczDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Julita KulbackaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8272-5440
Jolanta SaczkoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5273-5293
Natalia PachuraDepartment of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland.
Mieszko WieckiewiczDepartment of Experimental Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-7143
Roman GancarzDepartment of Engineering and Technology of Chemical Processes, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.
Kazimiera A WilkDepartment of Engineering and Technology of Chemical Processes, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-1761

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Slaskich we Wroclawiu STM. B022.17.013Wroclaw University of Science and Technology statutory activity subsidy from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the Faculty of Chemistry at the Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the chemical composition and biological properties of Polish propolis. Ethanol, ethanol-hexane, hexane and hexane-ethanol extracts of propolis from three different regions of Poland were prepared. On the basis of the evaluation of their chemical composition as well as the extraction yield and free radical scavenging activity, the ethanol and hexane-ethanol extractions were proposed as the most effective methods. Subsequently, the biological properties of the extracts were evaluated to investigate the selectivity of an anticancer effect on tongue cancer cells in comparison to normal gingival fibroblasts. The obtained products demonstrated anticancer activity against tongue cancer cells. Additionally, when the lowest extract concentration (100 µg/mL) was applied, they were not cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts. Finally, a possible anti-inflammatory potential of the prepared products was revealed, as reduced mitochondrial activity and proliferation of macrophages exposed to the extracts were observed. The results obtained indicate a potential of Polish propolis as a natural product with cancer-selective toxicity and anti-inflammatory effect. However, further studies are still needed to thoroughly explain the molecular mechanisms of its action and to obtain the promising health benefits of this versatile natural product.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsCell ProliferationFibroblastsHumansMacrophagesMitochondriaPlant ExtractsPolandPropolisTongue NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsPlant ExtractsPropolisanticancer agentanti-inflammatory agentantioxidantDPPHGC-MSgingival fibroblastsnatural extractoral cancertotal flavonoid contenttotal phenolic content

Identifiers

PMID32455950
PMCPMC7287845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.