Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32455922›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Hypoxia PET Imaging with [18F]-HX4-A Promising Next-Generation Tracer.

Sebastian Sanduleanu, Alexander M A van der Wiel, Relinde I Y Lieverse, Damiënne Marcus, Abdalla Ibrahim, Sergey Primakov, Guangyao Wu, Jan Theys, Ala Yaromina, Ludwig J Dubois and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. JACS Au · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent Advances ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Evaluation of a CD13 and Integrin αFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sebastian SanduleanuThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alexander M A van der WielThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Relinde I Y LieverseThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Damiënne MarcusThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abdalla IbrahimThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sergey PrimakovThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Guangyao WuThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jan TheysThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ala YarominaThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ludwig J DuboisThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8887-4137
Philippe LambinThe D-Lab and The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, 6211 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7961-0191

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek P14-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia-a common feature of the majority of solid tumors-is a negative prognostic factor, as it is associated with invasion, metastasis and therapy resistance. To date, a variety of methods are available for the assessment of tumor hypoxia, including the use of positron emission tomography (PET). A plethora of hypoxia PET tracers, each with its own strengths and limitations, has been developed and successfully validated, thereby providing useful prognostic or predictive information. The current review focusses on [18F]-HX4, a promising next-generation hypoxia PET tracer. After a brief history of its development, we discuss and compare its characteristics with other hypoxia PET tracers and provide an update on its progression into the clinic. Lastly, we address the potential applications of assessing tumor hypoxia using [18F]-HX4, with a focus on improving patient-tailored therapies.

Indexed as

[18F]-HX4molecular imagingpositron emission tomography (PET)response assessmenttheranosticstumor hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID32455922
PMCPMC7280995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.