ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2020
Coating Medpor
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Approaches in Microtia Treatment: Advancements in Tissue Engineering and Scaffold Design.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- [Research progress of three-dimensional bioprinting technology in auricle repair and reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
- Titanium Implants Coated with Hydroxyapatite Used in Orbital Wall Reconstruction-A Literature Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Use of Functional Biomaterials in Aesthetic and Functional Restoration in Orbital Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Polycaprolactone Fiber and Laminin and Collagen IV Protein Incorporation in Implants Enhances Wound Healing in a Novel Mouse Skin Splint Model.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the Usability of a Low-Cost 3D Printer in a Tissue Engineering Approach for External Ear Reconstruction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Surface Modification of Porous Polyethylene Implants with an Albumin-Based Nanocarrier-Release System.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Auricular reconstruction via 3D bioprinting strategies: An update.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inert biomaterials used for auricular reconstruction, which is one of the most challenging and diverse tasks in craniofacial or head and neck surgery, often cause problems such as capsule formation, infection, and skin extrusion. To solve these problems, scaffold consisting of inert biomaterial, high-density polyethylene (Medpor
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.