ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020
Biomechanical and Clinical Effect of Patient-Specific or Customized Knee Implants: A Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- No clinical advantage with customized individually made implants over conventional off-the-shelf implants in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Parametric bionic hand-inspired optimization of femoral condylar prosthesis attachment surfaces.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Fully automated workflow for designing patient-specific orthopaedic implants: Application to total knee arthroplasty.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Biomechanical analysis of patient specific cone vs conventional stem in revision total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- A reversible implantable memristor for health monitoring applications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Review
- Overcoming Challenges and Innovations in Orthopedic Prosthesis Design: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Printed Knee Implants: Insights into Surgeons' Points of View.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The impact of different alignment strategies on bone cuts for neutral knee phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Cost-utility analysis of total knee arthroplasty alone and in comparison with post-surgical rehabilitation and conservative treatment in the Republic of Kazakhstan.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Article
- No difference in patient-reported satisfaction after 12 months between customised individually made and off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Advanced strategies to thwart foreign body response to implantable devices.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- [Clinical studies in trauma surgery and orthopedics: read, interpret and implement].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Article
- MAPLE-prepared graphene oxide-based coatings for improved orthopedic screws used in knee interventions.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Although knee arthroplasty or knee replacement is already an effective clinical treatment, it continues to undergo clinical and biomechanical improvements. For an increasing number of conditions, prosthesis based on an individual patient's anatomy is a promising treatment. The aims of this review were to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical efficacy of patient-specific knee prosthesis, explore its future direction, and summarize any published comparative studies. (2) Methods: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles published prior to February 1, 2020, with the keywords "customized knee prosthesis" and "patient-specific knee prosthesis". We excluded patient-specific instrument techniques. (3) Results: Fifty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. In general, clinical improvement was greater with a patient-specific knee prosthesis than with a conventional knee prosthesis. In addition, patient-specific prosthesis showed improved biomechanical effect than conventional prosthesis. However, in one study, patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty showed a relatively high rate of aseptic loosening, particularly femoral component loosening, in the short- to medium-term follow-up. (4) Conclusions: A patient-specific prosthesis provides a more accurate resection and fit of components, yields significant postoperative improvements, and exhibits a high level of patient satisfaction over the short to medium term compared with a conventional prosthesis. However, the tibial insert design of the current patient-specific knee prosthesis does not follow the tibial plateau curvature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.