Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32455715›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Cysteine Cathepsins Inhibition Affects Their Expression and Human Renal Cancer Cell Phenotype.

Magdalena Rudzińska, Alessandro Parodi, Valentina D Maslova, Yuri M Efremov, Neonila V Gorokhovets, Vladimir A Makarov, Vasily A Popkov, Andrey V Golovin, Evgeni Y Zernii, Andrey A Zamyatnin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cathepsin Z/X: Breaking Down the Known and Unknown.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Biologics-based technologies for highly efficient and targeted RNA delivery.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Long Non-CodingNon-coding RNA · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena RudzińskaInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alessandro ParodiInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Valentina D MaslovaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9228-6389
Yuri M EfremovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-253X
Neonila V GorokhovetsInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir A MakarovInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Vasily A PopkovBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey V GolovinInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8908-4268
Evgeni Y ZerniiInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey A ZamyatninInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov University · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 16-15-10410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cancer would greatly benefit from new therapeutic strategies since, in advanced stages, it is refractory to classical chemotherapeutic approaches. In this context, lysosomal protease cysteine cathepsins may represent new pharmacological targets. In renal cancer, they are characterized by a higher expression, and they were shown to play a role in its aggressiveness and spreading. Traditional studies in the field were focused on understanding the therapeutic potentialities of cysteine cathepsin inhibition, while the direct impact of such therapeutics on the expression of these enzymes was often overlooked. In this work, we engineered two fluoromethyl ketone-based peptides with inhibitory activity against cathepsins to evaluate their potential anticancer activity and impact on the lysosomal compartment in human renal cancer. Molecular modeling and biochemical assays confirmed the inhibitory properties of the peptides against cysteine cathepsin B and L. Different cell biology experiments demonstrated that the peptides could affect renal cancer cell migration and organization in colonies and spheroids, while increasing their adhesion to biological substrates. Finally, these peptide inhibitors modulated the expression of LAMP1, enhanced the expression of E-cadherin, and altered cathepsin expression. In conclusion, the inhibition of cysteine cathepsins by the peptides was beneficial in terms of cancer aggressiveness; however, they could affect the overall expression of these proteases.

Indexed as

cysteine cathepsin inhibitorscysteine cathepsinslysosomerenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32455715
PMCPMC7281206
OpenAlexW3026139759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.