Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32455536›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Phages for Biofilm Removal.

Celia Ferriol-González, Pilar Domingo-Calap

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the use of bacteriophages for in vitro biofilm control.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Bacteriophage Therapy in Orthopaedics and Trauma].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Genomic and functional characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Virus Enhanced Microrobots for Biofilm Eradication.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Celia Ferriol-GonzálezDepartment of Genetics, Universitat de València, 46100 Valencia, Spain.
Pilar Domingo-CalapDepartment of Genetics, Universitat de València, 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2829-8809

Funding

European Research Council 724519European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 20200063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are clusters of bacteria that live in association with surfaces. Their main characteristic is that the bacteria inside the biofilms are attached to other bacterial cells and to the surface by an extracellular polymeric matrix. Biofilms are capable of adhering to a wide variety of surfaces, both biotic and abiotic, including human tissues, medical devices, and other materials. On these surfaces, biofilms represent a major threat causing infectious diseases and economic losses. In addition, current antibiotics and common disinfectants have shown limited ability to remove biofilms adequately, and phage-based treatments are proposed as promising alternatives for biofilm eradication. This review analyzes the main advantages and challenges that phages can offer for the elimination of biofilms, as well as the most important factors to be taken into account in order to design effective phage-based treatments.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancebacteriophagebiofilmphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID32455536
PMCPMC7277876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.