ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2019
Targeting Precision with Data Augmented Samples in Deep Learning.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building the Model.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the last five years, deep learning (DL) has become the state-of-the-art tool for solving various tasks in medical image analysis. Among the different methods that have been proposed to improve the performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), one typical approach is the augmentation of the training data set through various transformations of the input image. Data augmentation is typically used in cases where a small amount of data is available, such as the majority of medical imaging problems, to present a more substantial amount of data to the network and improve the overall accuracy. However, the ability of the network to improve the accuracy of the results when a slightly modified version of the same input is presented is often overestimated. This overestimation is the result of the strong correlation between data samples when they are considered independently in the training phase. In this paper, we emphasize the importance of optimizing for accuracy as well as precision among multiple replicates of the same training data in the context of data augmentation. To this end, we propose a new approach that leverages the augmented data to help the network focus on the precision through a specifically-designed loss function, with the ultimate goal to improve both the overall performance and the network's precision at the same time. We present two different applications of DL (regression and segmentation) to demonstrate the strength of the proposed strategy. We think that this work will pave the way to a explicit use of data augmentation within the loss function that helps the network to be invariant to small variations of the same input samples, a characteristic that is always required to every application in the medical imaging field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.