Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32455190›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Comparison of Transcriptomics Changes Induced by TCS and MTCS Exposure in Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells.

Xiaoqian Li, Yu Shang, Weiwei Yao, Yi Li, Ning Tang, Jing An, Yongjie Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoqian LiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Yu ShangSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Weiwei YaoSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Yi LiState Key Laboratory of Severe Weather & Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Ning TangInstitute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan.
Jing AnSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Yongjie WeiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Shanghai University · CNChinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences · CNKanazawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triclosan (TCS) has been a widely used antibacterial agent in medical and personal care products in the last few decades. Methyl TCS (MTCS) is the major biotransformation product of TCS through replacement of the hydroxyl group with methoxy. Previous studies revealed that MTCS showed reduced toxicity but enhanced environmental persistence, when compared with TCS. Till date, the toxicological molecular mechanisms of TCS and MTCS remain to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the transcriptomic changes in HepG2 cells induced by TCS and MTCS using microarray chips and to identify key target genes and related signal pathways. The microarray data showed that there were 1664 and 7144 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in TCS- and MTCS-treated groups, respectively. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed that TCS and MTCS induced overlapping as well as distinct transcriptome signatures in HepG2 cells. Both TCS and MTCS could result in various biological responses in HepG2 cells mainly responding to biosynthetic and metabolic processes but probably through different regulatory pathways. Among the selected 50 GO terms, 9 GO terms belonging to the cellular component category were only enriched in the MTCS group, which are mainly participating in the regulation of cellular organelle's function. KEGG analysis showed that 19 and 59 pathway terms were separately enriched in TCS and MTCS groups, with only seven identical pathways. The selected 10 TCS-specific signal pathways are mainly involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis, while the selected 10 MTCS-specific pathways mainly take part in the regulation of protein synthesis and modification. The overall data suggested that MTCS induced more enriched DEGs, GO terms, and pathway terms than TCS. In conclusion, compared with TCS, MTCS presents lower polarity and stronger lipophilicity, enabling MTCS to cause more extensive transcriptomic changes in HepG2 cells, activate differentiated signal pathways, and finally lead to differences in biological responses.

Identifiers

PMID32455190
PMCPMC7240827
OpenAlexW3022303630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.