Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32454972›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2020

Definitive re-irradiation of locally recurrent esophageal cancer after trimodality therapy in patients with a poor performance status.

Daniel W Kim, Sana Raoof, Nayan Lamba, Grace Lee, Danielle S Bitterman, Amandeep R Mahal, Nina N Sanford, Miranda B Lam, Harvey J Mamon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel W KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sana RaoofHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nayan LambaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Grace LeeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Danielle S BittermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Amandeep R MahalYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Nina N SanfordDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Miranda B LamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Harvey J MamonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few treatment guidelines for locally recurrent esophageal cancer after trimodality treatment (pre-operative chemoradiation followed by surgery) in patients with a poor performance status. The purpose of this single institutional, retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicities of definitive-intent re-irradiation for patients with recurrent esophageal cancer with a poor performance status [ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) ≥2]. Seven patients were identified with a median age of 74 years (range, 61-81 years). Four patients were ECOG 2 and three patients were ECOG 3. The median follow-up time after re-irradiation was 49 months. The median interval between initial radiotherapy and re-treatment was 32 months. Six patients received concurrent chemotherapy [carboplatin + paclitaxel in three patients; folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) + 5-fluorouracil in one patient; FOLFOX in one patient, and capecitabine in one patient]. At the last follow-up, the six patients who underwent concurrent chemotherapy had stable disease (86%), while the one who did not receive chemotherapy progressed (14%). Two patients developed metastases. Three patients developed acute (<6 months) grade 4 toxicities (dysphagia, anemia, esophagitis). There were no early deaths attributable to treatment. Late toxicities (>6 months) were limited to grades 1 and 2 dysphagia and pneumonitis in four patients. In conclusion, definitive re-irradiation of recurrent esophageal cancer in patients with a poor performance status appears to be safe with acceptable acute toxicity and late complications. It also appears to result in durable local control when combined with chemotherapy, albeit with a small number of patients and limited follow-up.

Indexed as

chemoradiationesophageal cancerpoor performance statusrecurrentre-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID32454972
PMCPMC7241232
OpenAlexW3023460511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.